E x starcraft ii professional#

In some ways, Starcraft 2 lifted restrictions in the game engine that made the original challenging. Micro-management was challenging due to the limitations of the game’s low resolution and low unit selection count. This was because players not only need to know strategies but also had to learn to implement them properly. Basic competence wasn’t difficult to achieve, but becoming a master required significant practice.

E x starcraft ii professional#

Starcraft was an excellent game for professional e-sports because it had a significant learning curve. This is where the argument becomes difficult. These improvements make the sequal a far better game for casual gamers. Starcraft II, with its improved ladder system and the elimination of some of the more intense micro-management tactics, does a better job of presenting itself as “easy to learn, hard to master.” Starcraft 2 also includes training scenarios that help new players grasp some of the details of playing the game well. was a fledging service that was updated over the course of years as the game evolved from a well-reviewed RTS title into an enduring competitive sport.Īlthough updates added much to the original game, it wasn’t designed as a competitive title from the ground up, and as a result it’s a rather difficult game for casual players to wrap their heads around. Although Blizzard new they had an excellent game on their hands, they had no way of predicting that it would become worldwide sensation and one of the most popular e-sports titles ever crafted. The original Starcraft was a surprising phenomena. Taking a look at the gameplay of each title is probably a better way to judge these games, and casual gaming is the natural place to start. It’s little surprise that the sequal has massively outsold the original. Today gaming is a widespread culturue phenomena in many countries across the globe. The gaming industry was a relatively niche entity back in 1998, the year of the original’s release. While the numbers above are interesting, that aren’t a good basis for a definitive conclusion about either game. When it comes to sales, the sequal clearly wins, having sold half as many units in a few months as the original game did over the course of a decade. Starcraft II sold nearly one million copies within the first day of its release and sold 4.5 million units by the end of 2010. What about sales? The first game sold 1.5 copies worldwide in 1998, and has since raised that figure to over 10 million since its release. The sequal manges only a 8.2, but over 1500 users have spoken up. The original game has earned a 9.3, but only 210 users have reported in. The user reviews on Metacritic take an opposite approach. Given the large disparity in data, it’s not possible to reach much of a conclusion based only off these reviews. This means there are less reviews making up the final score - only 15 for the original compared to 82 for the sequel.

It should be noted, however, that the original title was released before Metacritic came about. It’s best, perhaps, to start at the simpliest point of contention between these two titans - reviews and sales figures.Īccording to Metacritic reviews, Starcraft II slightly beat the original game, earning a score if 93 compared to the original’s 88. Comparing two games of such quality as Starcraft and Starcraft II isn’t easy.